Posts Tagged Left-wing politics

Deciphering the Jabba the Hutt “cryptic” tweet: ‘I put both my hands on both my ass cheeks’. 2+2=..

Michael Moore puts two and two together after Boston Marathon bombing

2+2 =


Michael Moore (@MMFlint) April 15, 2013

michael-moore-capIt’s possible that Michael Moore’s not pointing a finger in today’s Boston Marathon bombing with his somewhat cryptic tweets, but he doesn’t seem to be in any rush to correct people who are misinterpreting him either.

http://twitchy.com/

Continue reading →

, ,

2 Comments

And to this Left Wing Extremist I say: You and your ilk have destroyed the OBJECTIVE MEDIA for which the “Freedom of Press” was and still is, in the U.S. Constitution!

CNN ANALYST: ‘RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS’ COULD BE BEHIND BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING

Peter Bergen: “If it was more conventional explosives, which are much harder to get hold of now — that might be some other kind of right-wing extremist. … We’ve also seen, for instance, right-wing groups trying to attack the Martin Luther King parade in Oregon in 2010.”  http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism  by JOHN NOLTE

, ,

Leave a comment

Remember, Hillary was a prized Alinsky student..

STATE DEPARTMENT INTRODUCES ARAB VISITORS TO CONVICTED BOMBER BRETT KIMBERLIN

United Liberty points out that convicted “Speedway bomber” Brett Kimberlin and his Justice Through Music Project are partners with the U.S. Department of State in the “International Visitor Leadership Program,” a taxpayer-funded professional exchange program.by BREITBART NEWS

, , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

From one loon, to another..

Norway Suspect Borrowed From Unabomber’s Manifesto 

Fox News via Google..

DENVER –  Parts of the manifesto written by the suspect in Norway‘s terrorist attack were taken almost word for word from the writings of “Unabomber” Ted Kaczynski.

The passages copied by Anders Behring Breivik appear in the first few pages of Kaczynski’s manifesto. Breivik changed a Kaczynski screed on leftism and what he considered to be leftists’ “feelings of inferiority” — mainly by substituting the words “multiculturalism” or “cultural Marxism” for “leftism.”

For instance, Kaczynski wrote: “One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern society in general.”

Breivik’s manifesto reads: “One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is multiculturalism, so a discussion of the psychology of multiculturalists can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of Western Europe in general.”
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/07/24/norway-suspect-borrowed-from-unabombers-manifesto/#ixzz1T4FpcXBm

, , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Well of course, Lenin’s approach to governing is more to their liking..

Left-Wing Blog Suggests Obama Worst President Ever

Influential left-wing blog FireDogLake has the nerve to title a blog entry: ”
Worst President Ever, Revisited”. Eli writes :

No, I’m not ready to crown Barack Obama the Worst President Ever just yet, but…

The left-wing base wants more than the statist Barack Obama has given.Imagine that.

Posted by Steve Bartin/Newsalert

, , , , ,

Leave a comment

Great Name, but Obama’s INaction along with the enviro’s, will bring our nation to its knees..

With Energy Policy, President Schlemiel Tries the Same Thing Again

..and that’s not a joke, nor jokie name. That is NOT what the oath of office that he took, says!

“Do you have one of those hapless characters in your life? They are so incompetent in their everyday endeavors, but they smile a lot”.

, , , , , , ,

1 Comment

Race baiting once again, but then that’s all Lefties can speak about, with authority..

Power Line: Read it again, John via Glenn Reynolds

I thought it was a good idea for the Constitution to be read aloud on the floor of the House of Representatives as that body kicked off its new session. The reading reminded those present of the contents of our fundamental law and symbolized a commitment to adhere to that law.

But what seemed like a good idea turned out to be a great one. For instead of good naturedly going along with the exercise, or suffering in silence, a number of leftists publicly displayed their lack of comfort with, if not contempt for, the Constitution. Thus, the public received its clearest indication to date that the left regards the words of the Constitution as an impediment to its agenda.

Today, the day of the actual reading, the left was at it again. At least two Democratic representatives, including Jesse Jackson’s son, protested that the document read on the floor did not contain provisions of the Constitution that have been superseded by amendments. In particular, Jackson was unhappy that the provision counting slaves as only three-fifths of a person for the purposes of taxation and apportionment was “didacted” as he put it.

But if the purpose of the reading was to remind people of the contents of our fundamental law and to symbolize Congress’ commitment to adhering to that law, then it makes no sense to read portions of document that no longer apply. The reading Jackson and others wanted would make sense only if this were a history lesson. But it was not. History lessons are for speeches by individual members, each of whom has his or her own view about which aspects of history to emphasize. What all members of Congress have in common is their oath to uphold the Constitution as it stands today.

The goals of Jackson and other leftists who supported him are plain enough – to make America look bad and, simultaneously, to create skepticism about the quality of the Constitution as a whole. How sound, the thinking goes, can the rest of the original document be if it originally contained a provision counting slaves as three-fifths of a person for some purposes?

Again, however, this sort of argument is the stuff of speeches, not of a reading of the document members of Congress are sworn to uphold. But I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for speeches by members of Congress that attack the Constitution.

That is why the reading exercise proved to be such a stroke of genius. It gave the country a revealing glimpse of how the left really views the Constitution. Would monthly readings be overdoing it?


, , , ,

Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: