Paisan, Rudy, since when has the totalitarian left opposition EVER been “FAIR”? Granted..

..Christie brought this MESS upon himself by being lax OR stupid, if he is not lying. Christie being an lawyer, a partner IN a law firm and one time a United States Attorney, prosecuting political corruption and now as the Governor, I tend towards the lax and stupid.

                 Rudy: If Christie Not Lying, ‘Something Very Unfair Is Being Done to Him’

http://www.breitbart.com/

Idiocy In the Abundance! Oh Hell John, just ask your bud Barry to raise TAXES for YOUR courts, just like you did for Barrycare..

Chief Justice Warns Sequestration Cuts Already Threatening Public Safety

ROBERTS: Sequestration cuts have affected court operations across the spectrum. There are fewer court clerks to process new civil and bankruptcy cases, slowing the intake procedure and propagating delays throughout the litigation process. There are fewer probation and pretrial services officers to protect the public from defendants awaiting trial and from offenders following their incarceration and release into the community. There are fewer public defenders available to vindicate the Constitution’s guarantee of counsel to indigent criminal defendants, which leads to postponed trials and delayed justice for the innocent and guilty alike. There is less funding for security guards at federal courthouses, placing judges, court personnel, and the public at greater risk of harm.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/01/01/3109311/john-roberts-sequestration/#

Obamacare Upheld: How and Why Did Justice Roberts Do It?

The Supreme Court closed out its 2011–12 term today in dramatic fashion, upholding the Affordable Care Act by a sharply divided vote. The Court’s bottom line, reasoning and lineup of justices all came as a shock to many. While I had earlier cautioned doomsayers that the law was “not dead yet” after an oral argument that others deemed disastrous for the law’s defenders, I don’t think anyone predicted that the law would be upheld without the support of Justice Anthony Kennedy, almost always the Court’s crucial swing vote. And while most of the legal debate focused on Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause, the Court ultimately upheld the law as an exercise of the taxing power—even though President Obama famously claimed that the law was not a tax. The most surprising thing of all, though, is that in the end, this ultraconservative Court decided the case, much as it did in many other cases this term, by siding with the liberals.

Justice Kennedy, on whom virtually all hope for a decision upholding the law rested, voted with Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas. They would have invalidated all 900 pages of the law—even though the challengers had directly attacked only two of the law’s hundreds of provisions. But Chief Justice John Roberts sided with Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan to uphold the law as a valid exercise of Congress’s power to tax.

http://www.thenation.com/blog/168655/obamacare-upheld-how-and-why-did-justice-roberts-do-it

This ugly obese person(?) is just a member of the “if i had me a sons” crowd..

Zimmerman trial judge too tough?

http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/07/zimmerman-defense-rests-closing-statements-start-tomorrow/

 

As Mr. David Webb stated: “There’s sanity in the universe, just not enough of it.”..

 

EDUCATION

 

Arizona has the correct idea on “racialization”

 http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/Education by DAVID WEBB

In response to Coming soon to the University of Colorado: the “White Privilege Conference”:

There’s sanity in the universe, just not enough of it.

Federal judge: Arizona can ban classes promoting ‘racial resentment against ‘whites’ 

A federal appeals judge has upheld most of a 2010 Arizona state law that prohibits school districts from offering coursework that endorses the overthrow of the United States government or stokes resentment toward a race or class of people.

Friday’s ruling, by A. Wallace Tashima of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, declared three of the four sections of the law constitutional, reports the Arizona Daily Independent.

… 

The relevant sections of the contested law, commonly known among locals as House Bill 2281, forbid Arizona school districts and charter schools from:

1. Promoting the overthrow of the United States government.

2. Promoting resentment toward a race or class of people.

3. Designing courses primarily for pupils of a particular ethnic group.

4. Advocating ethnic solidarity instead of the treatment of pupils as individuals.

READ MORE ON: EDUCATION

This administration’s Benghazi Defense in action, once again. ‘keep piling the bullshit on this, ’till it goes away’. ‘we have to protect OUR davey boy’..

CLAIM: ATF SAID POLICE OKAYED ‘MEET THE PRESS’ GUN STUNT

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism  by WARNER TODD HUSTON

PERTINENT: having a clear decisive relevance to the matter in hand..

Madness, Deinstitutionalization & Murder via Interesting Statistics Regarding Deinstitutionalization Of Mentally Ill And Crime lonecon Bad Blue..

For those of us who came of age in the 1970s, one of the most shocking aspects of the last three decades was the rise of mass public shootings: people who went into public places and murdered complete strangers. Such crimes had taken place before, such as the Texas Tower murders by Charles Whitman in 1966,¹ but their rarity meant that they were shocking.

Something changed in the 1980s: these senseless mass murders started to happen with increasing frequency. People were shocked when James Huberty killed twenty-one strangers in a McDonald’s in San Ysidro, California in 1984, and Patrick Purdy murdered five children in a Stockton, California schoolyard in 1989. Now, these crimes have become background noise, unless they involve an extraordinarily high body count (such as at Virginia Tech) or a prominent victim (such as Rep. Gabrielle Giffords). Why did these crimes go from extraordinarily rare to commonplace?

For a while, it was fashionable to blame gun availability for this dramatic increase. But guns did not become more available before or during this change. Instead, federal law and many state laws became more restrictive on purchase and possession of firearms, sometimes in response to such crimes.² Nor has the nature of the weapons available to Americans changed all that much. In 1965, Popular Science announced that Colt was selling the AR-15, a semiautomatic version of the M-16 for the civilian market.³ The Browning Hi-Power, a 9mm semiautomatic pistol with a thirteen-round magazine, was offered for sale in the United States starting in 1954,⁴ and advertised for civilians in both the U.S. and Canada at least as early as 1960.⁵ If gun availability does not explain the increase of mass public murders, what else might?

At least half of these mass murderers (as well as many other murderers) have histories of mental illness. Many have already come to the attention of the criminal justice or mental health systems before they become headlines. In the early 1980s, there were about two million chronically mentally ill people in the United States, with 93 percent living outside mental hospitals. The largest diagnosis for the chronically mentally ill is schizophrenia, which afflicts about 1 percent of the population, or about 1.5 percent of adult Americans.⁶ A 1991 estimate was that schizophrenia costs the United States about $65 billion annually in direct and indirect costs.⁷

As is stated: Read. It. All.

Dunno’ about your area, city, burb, community or whatever..

..but just got back from Wal-Mart. County Sheriff department sitting out front with their Mobile Command Unit. Somehow I don’t think THAT is there entirely for the Black Friday Rush. Just could be for dumb ass workers, should they get…uhh, rowdy.

Law vehicles at ever ingress AND egress. MANY law vehicles.

OH BTW, yes I can and do understand folks wanting more money for the work they do.

Ohio Statute 3599 Only Applies to Those of Sane Mind. {footnote} this leaves the Left, completely out of the equation..

FOOD TENT DISPLAYING OBAMA SIGNS ERECTED OUTSIDE OHIO POLL

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/12/Food-Tent-Displaying-Obama-Campaign-Signs-Erected-Outside-Ohio-Poll

This is possibly a violation of Ohio statute 3599, which has a section that reads:

3599.01 Bribery. 

(A) No person shall before, during, or after any primary, convention, or election:

(1) Give, lend, offer, or procure or promise to give, lend, offer, or procure any money, office, position, place or employment, influence, or any other valuable consideration to or for a delegate, elector, or other person;

(2) Attempt by intimidation, coercion, or other unlawful means to induce such delegate or elector to register or refrain from registering or to vote or refrain from voting at a primary, convention, or election for a particular person, question, or issue;

(3) Advance, pay, or cause to be paid or procure or offer to procure money or other valuable thing to or for the use of another, with the intent that it or part thereof shall be used to induce such person to vote or to refrain from voting.

(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of bribery, a felony of the fourth degree; and if he is a candidate he shall forfeit the nomination he received, or if elected to any office he shall forfeit the office to which he was elected at the election with reference to which such offense was committed.

3599.02 Bribery – offenses concerning voters or voting. 

No person shall before, during, or after any primary, general, or special election or convention solicit, request, demand, receive, or contract for any money, gift, loan, property, influence, position, employment, or other thing of value for that person or for another person for doing any of the following:

(A) Registering or refraining from registering to vote;

(B) Agreeing to register or to refrain from registering to vote;

(C) Agreeing to vote or to refrain from voting;

(D) Voting or refraining from voting at any primary, general, or special election or convention for a particular person, question, or issue;

(E) Registering or voting, or refraining from registering or voting, or voting or refraining from voting for a particular person, question, or issue.

Whoever violates this section is guilty of bribery, a felony of the fourth degree, and shall be disfranchised and excluded from holding any public office for five years immediately following such conviction.