Archive for category Blogs
WOW, gotta notice from WordPress. My 7th year Anniversary. Time flies when you’re havin’ fun. Thanks Wordy..
I don’t know.
I don’t know how else to explain this. Can I really formulate an argument that will explain why we shouldn’t murder disabled children? If you don’t immediately recognize the eugenic slaughter of handicapped babies as something severely troubling, I’m not sure that I can offer any insights to help you understand.
You see, this is the problem. This is why we can’t come to any agreements. This is why our arguments are fruitless. They don’t have to be — arguing could be a rather worthwhile activity. But a constructive argument, or debate, or dialogue, or whatever you want to call it, requires both parties to have some shared concept of right vs wrong and fact vs fiction. Without that, neither side can appeal to the other, because they both exist in entirely different universes.
So, me personally, I’m livin’ over here in a world where it’s never OK to execute a disabled baby, or any baby, for any reason. In fact, in my universe — a universe we might call “reality” — the murder of children could be, without hyperbole, classified as THE worst thing. It is the worst of all that is bad. It is the lowest of low. It is the ugliest of ugly. It is the Pinnacle of Wrong. If it isn’t wrong to kill children, then it can not be wrong to do anything else.
Let me say that again, because it’s a crucial point:
If it isn’t wrong to kill children, then it can not be wrong to do anything else.
Literally anything else.
Read The Entire Article. Then the 950 or so comments..
UPDATED: They told me if I voted for Romney this would happen, and it did pjmedia.com/instapundit/17…—
Legal Insurrection (@LegInsurrection) July 23, 2013 http://twitchy.com/2013/07/23/godspeed-instapundit-blogfather-launches-grand-experiment/
Dats all I gotta say, OK TYPE picky, picky..
Shortly after the presidential debate last week, a number of liberal bloggers including ones at Daily Kos, FireDogLake, Democratic Underground, and the Daily Beast’s Andrew Sullivan, among others, began posting items suggesting that Mitt Romney had cheated during the debate.
The theory was that, as some video of the event appeared to suggest, Romney slipped a folded piece of paper out of his pocket and onto his podium just before the debate started. The bloggers suggested this was a “cheat sheet.” The theory was prettyclearly debunked. The paper was in fact a handkerchief … that Romney was shown later in the debate mopping his brow with.
No — We’ve never casted our lot with the tinfoil hat crowd.
Good read, Outstanding (most) comments. Stopped reading NRO, long ago and really got TICKED, when they began extreme bashing Gingrich..
..IMHO Derbyshire was and IS correct. He maybe could have used different verbiage. I don’t see or read anything more ‘hateful’ or ‘racist‘ then what individuals such as Sharpton, Jackson, Shabazz, Jones, Waters, Wright, Holder and even #44 use, or have used.
In other words, to counter Holder’s theme of “a nation of cowards” in regards to racial issues, Derbyshire right on, BUT NRO caved.
One will find another link or two, within this article. Particularly these two:
The article below, pictures a true hero AND is exactly what and how the citizens of our great nation should act. Period!